SHAYAM KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 884/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBJ010039752026

Filing Number

3215/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

884/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

221

Police Station

CHANDI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAYAM KUMAR

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Sessions Judge of Bhojpur rejected the bail petition of Shyam Kumar, accused of dowry death under BNS Sections 80 and 3(5), finding that a prima facie case is established given the unnatural death of his wife within one year of marriage and allegations of dowry demands and harassment. The court noted that the investigation is ongoing at an initial stage and Section 113-A of the Evidence Act presumption operates against the petitioner, rendering his bail application devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 884/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge of Bhojpur rejected the bail petition of Shyam Kumar, accused of dowry death under BNS Sections 80 and 3(5), finding that a prima facie case is established given the unnatural death of his wife within one year of marriage and allegations of dowry demands and harassment. The court noted that the investigation is ongoing at an initial stage and Section 113-A of the Evidence Act presumption operates against the petitioner, rendering his bail application devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case