AKASH SRIWASTVA vs State of Bihar — 887/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-b)A,26,35. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBJ010039722026

Filing Number

3213/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

887/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

TARARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-b)A,26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH SRIWASTVA

    Adv. Rakesh Kumar Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Summary The District & Sessions Judge of Bhojpur granted bail to three young petitioners (aged 18-20) charged under the Arms Act. The court found that while a country-made pistol and cartridge were recovered from one accused (Rajesh Kumar), nothing incriminating was recovered from the other two (Akash Srivastava and Nitish Kumar), the investigation was complete, all witnesses were police officials, and the accused had clean antecedents. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions prohibiting similar offences and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 887/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The District & Sessions Judge of Bhojpur granted bail to three young petitioners (aged 18-20) charged under the Arms Act. The court found that while a country-made pistol and cartridge were recovered from one accused (Rajesh Kumar), nothing incriminating was recovered from the other two (Akash Srivastava and Nitish Kumar), the investigation was complete, all witnesses were police officials, and the accused had clean antecedents. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions prohibiting similar offences and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case