RAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 684/2026

Case under Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010038582026

Filing Number

3110/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

684/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

18-Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

ARRAH MAHILA THANA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),85,351(2),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. DAYA SHANKAR PANDEY

  2. 2.MANJU DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Raj Kumar and Manju Devi in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case. The court found that despite serious allegations including dowry demands, assault, and ousting from the marital home, the accused's partition from family, lack of criminal history, and supporting witness statements warranted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, conditioned on non-interference in the marital dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 684/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Raj Kumar and Manju Devi in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case. The court found that despite serious allegations including dowry demands, assault, and ousting from the marital home, the accused's partition from family, lack of criminal history, and supporting witness statements warranted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, conditioned on non-interference in the marital dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case