ROHIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 855/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBJ010038572026

Filing Number

3109/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

855/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

491

Police Station

UDWANT NAGAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. LAVAKESH KUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.RAUNAK KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Rohit Kumar and Raunak Kumar Singh, who were accused of causing gunshot injury to the informant on Diwali 2024 under sections 109, 3(5) of BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found the allegations credible based on the injury report corroborating the FIR, noted the petitioners' involvement in two other criminal cases, and held that investigation was still in initial stages, making bail inappropriate at this juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 855/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Rohit Kumar and Raunak Kumar Singh, who were accused of causing gunshot injury to the informant on Diwali 2024 under sections 109, 3(5) of BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found the allegations credible based on the injury report corroborating the FIR, noted the petitioners' involvement in two other criminal cases, and held that investigation was still in initial stages, making bail inappropriate at this juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case