UMESH SAW ALIAS UMESH SAH AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 683/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010038552026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3107/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
683/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
CHANDI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMESH SAW ALIAS UMESH SAH AND ANOTHER
Adv. PANCHAM KUMAR
CHANDAN SAW ALIAS CHANDAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Disposed
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Umesh Sah (67-year-old senior citizen with clean record) and Chandan Saw in a case involving alleged assault and chain snatching. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case between co-villagers, and determined the allegations were general and omnibus, warranting bail on furnishing Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties, subject to availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Umesh Sah (67-year-old senior citizen with clean record) and Chandan Saw in a case involving alleged assault and chain snatching. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case between co-villagers, and determined the allegations were general and omnibus, warranting bail on furnishing Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties, subject to availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts