UMESH SAW ALIAS UMESH SAH AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 683/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010038552026

Filing Number

3107/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

683/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

CHANDI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH SAW ALIAS UMESH SAH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. PANCHAM KUMAR

  2. 2.CHANDAN SAW ALIAS CHANDAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Umesh Sah (67-year-old senior citizen with clean record) and Chandan Saw in a case involving alleged assault and chain snatching. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case between co-villagers, and determined the allegations were general and omnibus, warranting bail on furnishing Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties, subject to availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 683/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Umesh Sah (67-year-old senior citizen with clean record) and Chandan Saw in a case involving alleged assault and chain snatching. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case between co-villagers, and determined the allegations were general and omnibus, warranting bail on furnishing Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties, subject to availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case