RABI KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 671/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),303(2),352,351(2),3(5),110. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010037442026

Filing Number

3005/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

671/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

GIDHA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),303(2),352,351(2),3(5),110
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(r)(s)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABI KUMAR

    Adv. BHARAT SINGH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rabi Kumar, who was accused of assault with caste-indicative derogatory language, causing grievous injury to a co-worker on January 15, 2026. The court found the charges serious under SC/ST Act provisions and determined anticipatory bail was not maintainable given the gravity of the offense and the informant's supporting testimony in the case diary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 671/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rabi Kumar, who was accused of assault with caste-indicative derogatory language, causing grievous injury to a co-worker on January 15, 2026. The court found the charges serious under SC/ST Act provisions and determined anticipatory bail was not maintainable given the gravity of the offense and the informant's supporting testimony in the case diary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case