SOBRATI NAT AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 643/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010035692026

Filing Number

2839/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

643/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

420

Police Station

JAGDISHPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOBRATI NAT AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ARSHAD MD ZAFAR

  2. 2.SALAMU NAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Sobrati Nat and Salamu Nat) in a cattle theft case. Finding insufficient direct evidence against the petitioners despite a confessional statement by another accused, the court allowed bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, directing the petitioners to cooperate during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  8. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 643/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Sobrati Nat and Salamu Nat) in a cattle theft case. Finding insufficient direct evidence against the petitioners despite a confessional statement by another accused, the court allowed bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, directing the petitioners to cooperate during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case