MANOJ KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 642/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010035682026
Filing Number
2838/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
642/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
4-Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
AGIAON GARAHNI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR
Adv. SATENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Manoj Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious charges under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., including abduction, confinement, and unlawful marriage of a 15-year-old victim. The court found the victim's statement credible, corroborated by case diary evidence, establishing that the petitioner abducted the victim, confined her, and subjected her to physical abuse before abandoning her. Given the gravity and seriousness of the allegations, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
08-Apr-2026
Order
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
02-Mar-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 642/2026
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Manoj Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious charges under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., including abduction, confinement, and unlawful marriage of a 15-year-old victim. The court found the victim's statement credible, corroborated by case diary evidence, establishing that the petitioner abducted the victim, confined her, and subjected her to physical abuse before abandoning her. Given the gravity and seriousness of the allegations, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts