RABINA YADAV ALIAS RABIN KUMAR AND ORS. vs State of Bihar — 615/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010034732026

Filing Number

2752/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

615/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

06

Police Station

AAYAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,3(5)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(D),3(1)(D),3(2)(va

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABINA YADAV ALIAS RABIN KUMAR AND ORS.

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.SHEKHAR YADAV ALIAS RAJ SHEKHAR SINGH

  3. 3.RITESH YADAV ALIAS RAYIDER ALIAS RITESH KUMAR

  4. 4.MOHIT KESHARI ALIAS MOHIT KUMAR KESHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused persons charged under SC/ST Act sections including assault and caste-based abuse. The court found that the FIR allegations were supported by the informant and witnesses in the case diary, and considering the serious and grave nature of the offence under SC/ST Act Section 18, the anticipatory bail was dismissed as unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 615/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused persons charged under SC/ST Act sections including assault and caste-based abuse. The court found that the FIR allegations were supported by the informant and witnesses in the case diary, and considering the serious and grave nature of the offence under SC/ST Act Section 18, the anticipatory bail was dismissed as unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case