SUJEET KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 698/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,61(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBJ010033112026

Filing Number

2610/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

698/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

612

Police Station

UDWANT NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,61(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUJEET KUMAR

    Adv. SHAILENDRA PRATAP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The District & Sessions Judge granted bail to Sujeet Kumar in a firearm injury case, finding him falsely implicated. The court reasoned that petitioner was not named in the original FIR and only appeared in case records based on a co-accused's confessional statement—he was merely a SIM card vendor who sold a mobile number to the actual accused. The judge ordered his release on personal bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with standard conditions against similar offences and witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 698/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Sessions Judge granted bail to Sujeet Kumar in a firearm injury case, finding him falsely implicated. The court reasoned that petitioner was not named in the original FIR and only appeared in case records based on a co-accused's confessional statement—he was merely a SIM card vendor who sold a mobile number to the actual accused. The judge ordered his release on personal bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with standard conditions against similar offences and witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case