SUNIL KUMAR YADAV vs State of Bihar — 543/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,498A. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010030362026

Filing Number

2356/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

543/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,498A
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. MADHURENDRA KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed Sunil Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition, finding the allegations against him to be very serious. The court rejected the bail request because the complainant credibly testified about the petitioner's dowry demands of Rs. 5,00,000, physical abuse, expulsion from the matrimonial home, and seizure of her jewelry after establishing a relationship under the pretext of marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 543/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed Sunil Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition, finding the allegations against him to be very serious. The court rejected the bail request because the complainant credibly testified about the petitioner's dowry demands of Rs. 5,00,000, physical abuse, expulsion from the matrimonial home, and seizure of her jewelry after establishing a relationship under the pretext of marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case