SUJIT KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 487/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 331(4),305. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010027722026

Filing Number

2114/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

487/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

442

Police Station

KOILWAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 331(4),305

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUJIT KUMAR

    Adv. RAM ISHWAR PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Sujit Kumar, a 19-year-old with clean antecedents, accused of theft under BNS sections 331(4) and 305. The court found no incriminating evidence recovered from his possession, no independent witnesses supporting the prosecution, and the offense carried a maximum sentence under 7 years imprisonment, qualifying him for bail under Supreme Court precedent. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, conditional on police interrogation availability and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 487/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Sujit Kumar, a 19-year-old with clean antecedents, accused of theft under BNS sections 331(4) and 305. The court found no incriminating evidence recovered from his possession, no independent witnesses supporting the prosecution, and the offense carried a maximum sentence under 7 years imprisonment, qualifying him for bail under Supreme Court precedent. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, conditional on police interrogation availability and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case