AJAD THAKUR ALIAS AYAD BHUSAN THAKUR AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 469/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010027252026

Filing Number

2071/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

469/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

JAGDISHPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAD THAKUR ALIAS AYAD BHUSAN THAKUR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. Sanjay Pratap Singh

  2. 2.SHASHIKANT THAKUR ALIAS DUKHAN THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajad Thakur (59 years) and Shashikant Thakur (28 years) in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod and robbery stemming from a drainage dispute. The court found the injury non-grievous and noted the petitioners' claims of false implication and a counter-case, ordering bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties, subject to cooperation with police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 469/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajad Thakur (59 years) and Shashikant Thakur (28 years) in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod and robbery stemming from a drainage dispute. The court found the injury non-grievous and noted the petitioners' claims of false implication and a counter-case, ordering bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties, subject to cooperation with police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case