SANJAY SAW ALIAS SANJAY KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 420/2026

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010025112026

Filing Number

1877/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

420/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

BABURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY SAW ALIAS SANJAY KUMAR

    Adv. VASUDEV NARAYAN SACCHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The II Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed Sanjay Saw's anticipatory bail petition in an electricity theft case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. The court found the allegations serious—involving illegal electricity tapping causing ₹56,128 revenue loss to South Bihar Power Distribution Company—and noted the petitioner's unwillingness to compensate, while investigation remained pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 420/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The II Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed Sanjay Saw's anticipatory bail petition in an electricity theft case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. The court found the allegations serious—involving illegal electricity tapping causing ₹56,128 revenue loss to South Bihar Power Distribution Company—and noted the petitioner's unwillingness to compensate, while investigation remained pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case