VIKAS KUMAR PASWAN ALIAS VIKAS PASWAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 417/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),351(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010025082026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1874/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
417/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
ARRAH MUFFASSIL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIKAS KUMAR PASWAN ALIAS VIKAS PASWAN AND OTHERS
Adv. ABHAY KUMAR SINGH
MANTU KUMAR ALIAS MANTU PASWAN
SUNITA DEVI
SUBAN RAM ALIAS SUBAN PASWAN
UPENDRA KUMAR ALIAS UPENDRA PASWAN
PINTU PASWAN
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Disposed
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 10-02-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Court of District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Vikash Kumar Paswan and five others) charged with assault under BNS sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 351(3). The court found insufficient material on record to establish the genuineness of allegations, noting no injury report was filed despite considerable time lapsing since the FIR lodging date of 25.01.2026, and concluded the dispute between parties appeared exaggerated. The petitioners were granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court of District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Vikash Kumar Paswan and five others) charged with assault under BNS sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 351(3). The court found insufficient material on record to establish the genuineness of allegations, noting no injury report was filed despite considerable time lapsing since the FIR lodging date of 25.01.2026, and concluded the dispute between parties appeared exaggerated. The petitioners were granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts