VIKAS KUMAR PASWAN ALIAS VIKAS PASWAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 417/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),351(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010025082026
Filing Number
1874/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
417/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
ARRAH MUFFASSIL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKAS KUMAR PASWAN ALIAS VIKAS PASWAN AND OTHERS
Adv. ABHAY KUMAR SINGH
-
2.MANTU KUMAR ALIAS MANTU PASWAN
-
3.SUNITA DEVI
-
4.SUBAN RAM ALIAS SUBAN PASWAN
-
5.UPENDRA KUMAR ALIAS UPENDRA PASWAN
-
6.PINTU PASWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Court of District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Vikash Kumar Paswan and five others) charged with assault under BNS sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 351(3). The court found insufficient material on record to establish the genuineness of allegations, noting no injury report was filed despite considerable time lapsing since the FIR lodging date of 25.01.2026, and concluded the dispute between parties appeared exaggerated. The petitioners were granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 417/2026
Summary: The Court of District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Vikash Kumar Paswan and five others) charged with assault under BNS sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 351(3). The court found insufficient material on record to establish the genuineness of allegations, noting no injury report was filed despite considerable time lapsing since the FIR lodging date of 25.01.2026, and concluded the dispute between parties appeared exaggerated. The petitioners were granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts