PRAVEEN YADAV ALIAS JHAPPU YADAV vs State of Bihar — 415/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010024682026

Filing Number

1836/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

415/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

4-Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

RLY PATNA BUXAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVEEN YADAV ALIAS JHAPPU YADAV

    Adv. AVDHESH TIWARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Praveen Yadav, who was accused of murdering the informant's husband and disposing of his body on railway tracks under BNS Sections 61(2), 103(1), and 3(5). The court found the allegations serious based on witness statements, inquest and postmortem reports showing a fatal head injury, and noted that bail for co-accused had already been rejected and the investigation was at an initial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Order

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 415/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Praveen Yadav, who was accused of murdering the informant's husband and disposing of his body on railway tracks under BNS Sections 61(2), 103(1), and 3(5). The court found the allegations serious based on witness statements, inquest and postmortem reports showing a fatal head injury, and noted that bail for co-accused had already been rejected and the investigation was at an initial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case