CHINTU KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 395/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010024022026

Filing Number

1775/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

395/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

349

Police Station

ARRAH MUFFASSIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINTU KUMAR

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to 19-year-old Chintu Kumar in a armed robbery case, finding that he was implicated solely based on the confessional statement of co-accused Vishal Kumar, which is inadmissible under Section 22 of BSA, 2023, and that the petitioner was never identified by the informant during police identification proceedings. The bail was granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and no tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 395/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to 19-year-old Chintu Kumar in a armed robbery case, finding that he was implicated solely based on the confessional statement of co-accused Vishal Kumar, which is inadmissible under Section 22 of BSA, 2023, and that the petitioner was never identified by the informant during police identification proceedings. The bail was granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and no tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case