SATYNARAYAN SINGH AND ORS. vs State of Bihar — 394/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),351,352,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010023992026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1773/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
394/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
PIRO
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATYNARAYAN SINGH AND ORS.
Adv. ADITYA PRASAD
RAJNISH KUMAR
MANISH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Disposed
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Satynarayan Singh, Rajnish Kumar, and Manish Kumar) accused of theft and assault under Section 379 IPC, finding the offences are bailable and punishable with less than 7 years imprisonment. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents (Arnesh Kumar and Satyendra Kumar Antil cases) and the fact that the prosecution failed to submit case diary despite 42 days passing since petition filing. The petitioners were ordered to furnish Rs. 10,000 bail-bond with two sureties each and comply with conditions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Satynarayan Singh, Rajnish Kumar, and Manish Kumar) accused of theft and assault under Section 379 IPC, finding the offences are bailable and punishable with less than 7 years imprisonment. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents (Arnesh Kumar and Satyendra Kumar Antil cases) and the fact that the prosecution failed to submit case diary despite 42 days passing since petition filing. The petitioners were ordered to furnish Rs. 10,000 bail-bond with two sureties each and comply with conditions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts