RAMNARAYAN RAM AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 319/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010020582026

Filing Number

1469/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

319/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

606

Police Station

UDWANT NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMNARAYAN RAM AND ANOTHER

    Adv. KUNAL KUMAR

  2. 2.GOPAL RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners Ramnarayan Ram and Gopal Ram in a family dispute case involving simple injuries. The court found that the injuries sustained were trivial (non-vital body parts), the petitioners had clean antecedents, and no grievous injury warranted custody, hence ordered bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 319/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners Ramnarayan Ram and Gopal Ram in a family dispute case involving simple injuries. The court found that the injuries sustained were trivial (non-vital body parts), the petitioners had clean antecedents, and no grievous injury warranted custody, hence ordered bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case