MD ARMAN, S/o - MD BABLU @ RUSTAM RAYEEN vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 595/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137, 140. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBG010027952026
Filing Number
2496/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
595/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
Bhagalpur DJ Div.
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
126
Police Station
SULTANGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD ARMAN, S/o - MD BABLU @ RUSTAM RAYEEN
Adv. MD.FAIYAZ
-
2.GURIYA KHATOON, W/o - MD BABLU
-
3.MD BABLU S/o - BARATI MIYA
-
4.MUSKAN AJMERI, D/o - MD BABLU
-
5.MUSKAN AJMERI, D/o - MD BABLU
-
6.MD CHAND, S/o - BARATI MIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 595/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six accused persons charged under BNS sections 137(2) and 140(3) for allegedly kidnapping the informant's wife and withdrawing Rs. 2 lakh from her account. The court found the allegations serious, noting that the victim was recovered during investigation, witness statements corroborated the prosecution case, and the informant testified in court about the financial and emotional harm caused to his family. The petitioners were directed to apply for regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 595/2026
Case Summary: 595/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six accused persons charged under BNS sections 137(2) and 140(3) for allegedly kidnapping the informant's wife and withdrawing Rs. 2 lakh from her account. The court found the allegations serious, noting that the victim was recovered during investigation, witness statements corroborated the prosecution case, and the informant testified in court about the financial and emotional harm caused to his family. The petitioners were directed to apply for regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts