BIBI TARA KHATOON vs UMAR SAYEED KHAN — 34/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Order. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBE220000472020
Filing Number
41/2020
Filing Date
25-Nov-2020
Registration No
34/2020
Registration Date
25-Nov-2020
Court
Bakhri Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIBI TARA KHATOON
Adv. NEERAJ KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UMAR SAYEED KHAN
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary Title Suit No. 31/2020 | Sub-Judge-I, Bakhri, Begusarai | Order dated 13.02.2026 Outcome: Petition Rejected and Disposed The court rejected the defendants' petition challenging the court fee paid by the plaintiff. The defendants argued the plaintiff undervalued the suit land to evade ad-valorem court fees, but the court held that since the plaintiff (a non-executant) seeks only a declaration that the sale deeds are void ab initio and temporary injunction, a fixed declaratory court fee applies rather than ad-valorem fees. The suit proceeds as filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Order
Sub Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Order
Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
16-May-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Order
Sub Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
11-Sep-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
31-May-2024
Order
Sub Judge
-
24-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
03-Nov-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Sep-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Aug-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Jul-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
17-May-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-Apr-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
31-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
03-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
13-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
08-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
27-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-May-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
03-Sep-2021
Stistedar Report
-
30-Jun-2021
Stistedar Report
-
11-May-2021
Stistedar Report
-
12-Apr-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub Judge
-
01-Apr-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub Judge
-
26-Mar-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub Judge
-
18-Jan-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub Judge
-
24-Dec-2020
Stistedar Report
Sub Judge
-
08-Dec-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2020
Case Summary Title Suit No. 31/2020 | Sub-Judge-I, Bakhri, Begusarai | Order dated 13.02.2026 Outcome: Petition Rejected and Disposed The court rejected the defendants' petition challenging the court fee paid by the plaintiff. The defendants argued the plaintiff undervalued the suit land to evade ad-valorem court fees, but the court held that since the plaintiff (a non-executant) seeks only a declaration that the sale deeds are void ab initio and temporary injunction, a fixed declaratory court fee applies rather than ad-valorem fees. The suit proceeds as filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts