ANANDI YADAV AND OTHERS vs PURAN YADAV AND OTHERS — 162/1994
Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBE220000011994
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
162/1994
Filing Date
20-09-1994
Registration No
162/1994
Registration Date
20-09-1994
Court
Bakhri Civil Division
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Petitioner(s)
ANANDI YADAV AND OTHERS
Respondent(s)
PURAN YADAV AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 04-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 28-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In Title Suit No. 162/1994 (Anandi Yadav & Ors. v. Puran Yadav & Ors.), a 30+ year-old partition suit, the court rejected the petition filed by defendants no. 07 and 08 seeking permission to adduce fresh evidence. The court found the application was an attempt to re-open closed evidence stage and delay proceedings, holding that under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC and Section 151 CPC, witnesses cannot be recalled except in exceptional circumstances to clarify ambiguities—none of which existed here. The case, now at the argument stage, is directed to proceed toward final disposal in compliance with High Court directives for early resolution of oldest pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Title Suit No. 162/1994 (Anandi Yadav & Ors. v. Puran Yadav & Ors.), a 30+ year-old partition suit, the court rejected the petition filed by defendants no. 07 and 08 seeking permission to adduce fresh evidence. The court found the application was an attempt to re-open closed evidence stage and delay proceedings, holding that under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC and Section 151 CPC, witnesses cannot be recalled except in exceptional circumstances to clarify ambiguities—none of which existed here. The case, now at the argument stage, is directed to proceed toward final disposal in compliance with High Court directives for early resolution of oldest pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts