RAM VINOD SINGH vs BIKKI KUMAR @ GORELAL — 288/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,324,326,307,504,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRBE110004252021
Filing Number
21664/2021
Filing Date
22-Oct-2021
Registration No
288/2021
Registration Date
22-Oct-2021
Court
CJM Div. Manjhaul
Judge
4-Sdjm
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
218
Police Station
KHODAWANDPUR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM VINOD SINGH
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIKKI KUMAR @ GORELAL
-
2.AMAN KUMAR
-
3.SANJAY SINGH
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sdjm
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sdjm
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sdjm
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
31-Jul-2025
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary: The State's application under Section 311 CrPC to examine additional witnesses (Subham Kumar, Dayaram Singh, and Ramkumari Devi) in case State v. Vikki Kumar has been allowed. The court found that these witnesses were mentioned in the FIR and are essential for a just disposal of the case, despite not being formally listed in the charge sheet column. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
28-May-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sdjm
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
06-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
27-May-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
15-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
08-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sdjm
-
18-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
04-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
30-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
05-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
04-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
05-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
24-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
08-Jun-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
11-May-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
10-Apr-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
03-Mar-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
31-Jan-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
21-Jan-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
04-Jan-2023
Evidence
Sdjm
-
30-Nov-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
10-Nov-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
20-Sep-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
18-Aug-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
18-Jul-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
06-Jul-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
08-Jun-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
03-Jun-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
29-Apr-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
25-Mar-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
28-Jan-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
10-Dec-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Sdjm
-
16-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 288/2021
Summary: The State's application under Section 311 CrPC to examine additional witnesses (Subham Kumar, Dayaram Singh, and Ramkumari Devi) in case State v. Vikki Kumar has been allowed. The court found that these witnesses were mentioned in the FIR and are essential for a just disposal of the case, despite not being formally listed in the charge sheet column. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts