INDU DEVI AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 496/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBE010022842026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2138/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
496/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
64-District and Addl. Sessions Judge IX
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Chakia OP
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INDU DEVI AND OTHERS
Adv. CHANDRA MOHAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 64-District and Addl. Sessions Judge IX
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | ORDER | |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 19-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected the anticipatory bail application of six accused-petitioners (Babita Devi, Ranjit Yadav, Ashok Yadav, Ghanshyam Kumar, Lalchu Yadav, and Doman Yadav) in a case involving allegations of unlawful assembly, assault with weapons, extortion demand of ₹50 lakh, and theft of ornaments. The court found the prosecution case sufficiently supported by witness statements and injury reports showing that multiple persons sustained injuries, including one grievous injury, making the allegations serious enough to deny anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected the anticipatory bail application of six accused-petitioners (Babita Devi, Ranjit Yadav, Ashok Yadav, Ghanshyam Kumar, Lalchu Yadav, and Doman Yadav) in a case involving allegations of unlawful assembly, assault with weapons, extortion demand of ₹50 lakh, and theft of ornaments. The court found the prosecution case sufficiently supported by witness statements and injury reports showing that multiple persons sustained injuries, including one grievous injury, making the allegations serious enough to deny anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts