RAJ KUMAR PANDIT AND OTHER vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 281/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBE010012952026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
1213/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
281/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
443
Police Station
TEGHRA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJ KUMAR PANDIT AND OTHER
Adv. BIPIN KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Md. Sohrab, accused of kidnapping a minor girl under Section 87 of B.N.S., citing the serious nature of allegations, involvement of a minor victim, rejection of co-accused bail applications, and ongoing investigation. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the lower court and file a regular bail application, which will be considered independently on merit without prejudice from this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 281/2026
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Md. Sohrab, accused of kidnapping a minor girl under Section 87 of B.N.S., citing the serious nature of allegations, involvement of a minor victim, rejection of co-accused bail applications, and ongoing investigation. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the lower court and file a regular bail application, which will be considered independently on merit without prejudice from this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts