UMESH PUJHAR vs State (Bihar) — 157/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
B.P. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRBA010010512026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
964/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
157/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
KATORIYA
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMESH PUJHAR
Adv. Balram Prasad Yadav
Respondent(s)
State (Bihar)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Banka granted bail to Umesh Pujha in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) after he had been in jail for over two years. The court found that while the petitioner had six prior criminal cases, he was not named in the original FIR and was arrested based on a confessional statement; critically, despite charges being framed in November 2025, the prosecution had examined no witnesses despite multiple adjournments. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with a condition that any third default in court appearance would result in cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Banka granted bail to Umesh Pujha in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) after he had been in jail for over two years. The court found that while the petitioner had six prior criminal cases, he was not named in the original FIR and was arrested based on a confessional statement; critically, despite charges being framed in November 2025, the prosecution had examined no witnesses despite multiple adjournments. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with a condition that any third default in court appearance would result in cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts