UMESH PUJHAR vs State (Bihar) — 157/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

B.P. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRBA010010512026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

964/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

157/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Banka

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

267

Police Station

KATORIYA

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH PUJHAR

    Adv. Balram Prasad Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State (Bihar)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    ContestedView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Banka granted bail to Umesh Pujha in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) after he had been in jail for over two years. The court found that while the petitioner had six prior criminal cases, he was not named in the original FIR and was arrested based on a confessional statement; critically, despite charges being framed in November 2025, the prosecution had examined no witnesses despite multiple adjournments. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with a condition that any third default in court appearance would result in cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Banka granted bail to Umesh Pujha in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) after he had been in jail for over two years. The court found that while the petitioner had six prior criminal cases, he was not named in the original FIR and was arrested based on a confessional statement; critically, despite charges being framed in November 2025, the prosecution had examined no witnesses despite multiple adjournments. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with a condition that any third default in court appearance would result in cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case