RANEET KUMAR SINGH vs State (Bihar) — 257/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109()352,351(2)3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th April 2026.
A. B. P. - Anticipatory Bail Application
CNR: BRBA010008562026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
785/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
257/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
27
Police Station
AMARPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANEET KUMAR SINGH
Adv. Subodh Kumar Mishra
Respondent(s)
-
1.State (Bihar)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
ContestedView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions of Ranveer Kumar Singh and Ranjit Kumar Singh, who were accused of assaulting Shravan Kumar Singh with an iron rod and blackjack, causing a fractured frontal bone and severe head injuries. The court found the allegations serious and the nature of injuries grave, making it inappropriate to grant pre-arrest bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 257/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions of Ranveer Kumar Singh and Ranjit Kumar Singh, who were accused of assaulting Shravan Kumar Singh with an iron rod and blackjack, causing a fractured frontal bone and severe head injuries. The court found the allegations serious and the nature of injuries grave, making it inappropriate to grant pre-arrest bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts