ANIL SINGH vs State (Bihar) — 187/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2).3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
A. B. P. - Anticipatory Bail Application
CNR: BRBA010006202026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
573/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
270
Police Station
DHORAIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL SINGH
Adv. RAVI SHANKAR
-
2.SURENDRA SINGH
Adv. RAVI SHANKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State (Bihar)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
ContestedView PDF
Case Summary: 187/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anil Singh and Surendra Singh, who faced charges for allegedly assaulting Anil Yadav and others on 29.09.2025 under BNS sections including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found the case unsuitable for custodial interrogation based on the simple nature of injuries documented in the case diary and allowed bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 187/2026
Case Summary: 187/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anil Singh and Surendra Singh, who faced charges for allegedly assaulting Anil Yadav and others on 29.09.2025 under BNS sections including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found the case unsuitable for custodial interrogation based on the simple nature of injuries documented in the case diary and allowed bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts