Prince Kumar Alias Chunu Prince Raj vs State of Bihar — 609/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 28th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010032232026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
2938/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
609/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
4-District Addl. S J- IV
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
AURANGABAD TOWN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prince Kumar Alias Chunu Prince Raj
Adv. Praveen kumar singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Prince Kumar (age 20) in a case involving allegations of eve-teasing and assault. The FIR charges him under BNS sections related to wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and rioting for allegedly assaulting the informant with iron rods, wickets, and bamboo, causing serious head injuries including lacerated wounds and scalp hematoma. The court declined bail considering the serious nature of allegations, vital injury to the head region, eyewitness corroboration, and the eve-teasing genesis of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J- IV
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 609/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Prince Kumar (age 20) in a case involving allegations of eve-teasing and assault. The FIR charges him under BNS sections related to wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and rioting for allegedly assaulting the informant with iron rods, wickets, and bamboo, causing serious head injuries including lacerated wounds and scalp hematoma. The court declined bail considering the serious nature of allegations, vital injury to the head region, eyewitness corroboration, and the eve-teasing genesis of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts