Prince Kumar Alias Chunu Prince Raj vs State of Bihar — 609/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 28th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010032232026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

2938/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

609/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

4-District Addl. S J- IV

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

AURANGABAD TOWN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Prince Kumar Alias Chunu Prince Raj

Adv. Praveen kumar singh

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Addl. S J- IV

28-04-2026

Disposed

23-04-2026

HEARING

22-04-2026

HEARING

10-04-2026

HEARING

07-04-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
Bail Order

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Prince Kumar (age 20) in a case involving allegations of eve-teasing and assault. The FIR charges him under BNS sections related to wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and rioting for allegedly assaulting the informant with iron rods, wickets, and bamboo, causing serious head injuries including lacerated wounds and scalp hematoma. The court declined bail considering the serious nature of allegations, vital injury to the head region, eyewitness corroboration, and the eve-teasing genesis of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Prince Kumar (age 20) in a case involving allegations of eve-teasing and assault. The FIR charges him under BNS sections related to wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and rioting for allegedly assaulting the informant with iron rods, wickets, and bamboo, causing serious head injuries including lacerated wounds and scalp hematoma. The court declined bail considering the serious nature of allegations, vital injury to the head region, eyewitness corroboration, and the eve-teasing genesis of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case