Chandan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 295/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010032192026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

2934/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

295/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

4-District Addl. S J- IV

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Aurangabad Cyber

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandan Kumar

    Adv. Krishna Pratap

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Chandan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (295/2026) The court rejected Chandan Kumar's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated after innocently giving his bank passbook, ATM card, and SIM card to another person who misused them; however, the court found documentary evidence showing his account received ₹2,00,000 and immediately transferred ₹1,99,000, with active involvement in receiving 5% commissions through gaming-related cyber fraud activities spanning multiple states. Given the serious nature of cyber fraud allegations and substantial amounts involved, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J- IV

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chandan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (295/2026) The court rejected Chandan Kumar's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated after innocently giving his bank passbook, ATM card, and SIM card to another person who misused them; however, the court found documentary evidence showing his account received ₹2,00,000 and immediately transferred ₹1,99,000, with active involvement in receiving 5% commissions through gaming-related cyber fraud activities spanning multiple states. Given the serious nature of cyber fraud allegations and substantial amounts involved, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case