Chandan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 295/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010032192026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

2934/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

295/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

4-District Addl. S J- IV

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Aurangabad Cyber

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Chandan Kumar

Adv. Krishna Pratap

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Addl. S J- IV

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

HEARING

26-03-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary: Chandan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (295/2026) The court rejected Chandan Kumar's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated after innocently giving his bank passbook, ATM card, and SIM card to another person who misused them; however, the court found documentary evidence showing his account received ₹2,00,000 and immediately transferred ₹1,99,000, with active involvement in receiving 5% commissions through gaming-related cyber fraud activities spanning multiple states. Given the serious nature of cyber fraud allegations and substantial amounts involved, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chandan Kumar vs. State of Bihar (295/2026) The court rejected Chandan Kumar's bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated after innocently giving his bank passbook, ATM card, and SIM card to another person who misused them; however, the court found documentary evidence showing his account received ₹2,00,000 and immediately transferred ₹1,99,000, with active involvement in receiving 5% commissions through gaming-related cyber fraud activities spanning multiple states. Given the serious nature of cyber fraud allegations and substantial amounts involved, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case