Golu Kumar vs State of Bihar — 590/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010030562026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

2798/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

590/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

TANDWA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Golu Kumar

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  2. 2.Akash Kumar

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR

  3. 3.Bhim Kumar

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR

  4. 4.Chhotu Kumar

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR

  5. 5.Munni Devi

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR

  6. 6.Tara Kunwar

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad allowed the anticipatory bail petition of six petitioners accused of theft, criminal intimidation, and outraging modesty of women. The court granted bail on finding that the informant retracted allegations, stating the incident was merely a village scuffle with no actual molestation, and the petitioners had no criminal history, warranting their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 590/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad allowed the anticipatory bail petition of six petitioners accused of theft, criminal intimidation, and outraging modesty of women. The court granted bail on finding that the informant retracted allegations, stating the incident was merely a village scuffle with no actual molestation, and the petitioners had no criminal history, warranting their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case