Prateek Kumar alias Prateek Trivedi Golu vs State of Bihar — 573/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010029392026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

2689/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

573/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

GOH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prateek Kumar alias Prateek Trivedi Golu

    Adv. sanjay kumar dwivedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Prateek Kumar, who was accused of armed robbery and threats under BNS 2023 sections. The court found that the petitioner had concealed two prior criminal cases (involving rioting, assault, and arms violations) from the court while claiming to have no antecedents, constituting material misrepresentation. The petitioner was granted liberty to renew the bail application after properly disclosing his criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 573/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Prateek Kumar, who was accused of armed robbery and threats under BNS 2023 sections. The court found that the petitioner had concealed two prior criminal cases (involving rioting, assault, and arms violations) from the court while claiming to have no antecedents, constituting material misrepresentation. The petitioner was granted liberty to renew the bail application after properly disclosing his criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case