Ajay Thakur vs State of Bihar — 567/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010029172026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

2670/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

567/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

MALI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajay Thakur

    Adv. Krishna Prasad

  2. 2.Lavkush Thakur

    Adv. Krishna Prasad

  3. 3.Ful Kumari

    Adv. Krishna Prasad

  4. 4.Rampravesh Thakur

    Adv. Krishna Prasad

  5. 5.Ranjit Thakur

    Adv. Krishna Prasad

  6. 6.Mukesh Thakur

    Adv. Krishna Prasad

  7. 7.Prince Thakur

    Adv. Krishna Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to all six petitioners in a case involving alleged assault during a land dispute. The judge found that injuries sustained were simple in nature (confined to hands, not head as alleged), the petitioners had no prior criminal record, and similar accused in an earlier FIR had already been released on bail. The petitioners were ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 567/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to all six petitioners in a case involving alleged assault during a land dispute. The judge found that injuries sustained were simple in nature (confined to hands, not head as alleged), the petitioners had no prior criminal record, and similar accused in an earlier FIR had already been released on bail. The petitioners were ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case