Laalu Kumar Alias Yuvraj Kumar vs State of Bihar — 258/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010027272026
e-Filing Number
01-03-2026
Filing Number
2488/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
258/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
23-District Addl. S J-III cum special judge MP.s/Mla case
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
261
Police Station
HASPURA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Laalu Kumar Alias Yuvraj Kumar
Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Laalu Kumar, accused of serious crimes including assault, firearm discharge, and outrage of modesty during a violent attack on the informant and his family. The court found sufficient material evidence against the petitioner, including direct allegations, witness corroboration, recovered ammunition, and five prior serious criminal antecedents, warranting continued custody during investigation. The petitioner was permitted to renew his bail application after the chargesheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J-III cum special judge MP.s/Mla case
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-III cum special judge MP.s/Mla case
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-III cum special judge MP.s/Mla case
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-III cum special judge MP.s/Mla case
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 258/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Laalu Kumar, accused of serious crimes including assault, firearm discharge, and outrage of modesty during a violent attack on the informant and his family. The court found sufficient material evidence against the petitioner, including direct allegations, witness corroboration, recovered ammunition, and five prior serious criminal antecedents, warranting continued custody during investigation. The petitioner was permitted to renew his bail application after the chargesheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts