Arvind Yadav vs State of Bihar — 507/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010026242026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
2396/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
507/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
PAUTHU
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arvind Yadav
Adv. Surendra kumar
-
2.Sunil Yadav
Adv. Surendra kumar
-
3.Ajit Yadav alias Ajit Kumar
Adv. Surendra kumar
-
4.Ranjit Yadav alias Ranjit kumar
Adv. Surendra kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners accused of assault, theft, and misbehavior in a land dispute case. The judge allowed the bail petition because the injuries were simple in nature (caused by hand, fist, and lathi with no deadly weapons used) and a counter-case exists between the parties, directing release on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 507/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners accused of assault, theft, and misbehavior in a land dispute case. The judge allowed the bail petition because the injuries were simple in nature (caused by hand, fist, and lathi with no deadly weapons used) and a counter-case exists between the parties, directing release on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts