Alok Kumar Ranjan vs State of Bihar — 491/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010025502026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
2328/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
491/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
4-District Addl. S J- IV
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
126
Police Station
DAUDNAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alok Kumar Ranjan
Adv. Ramjee singh
Rahul Kumar
Adv. Ramjee singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Addl. S J- IV
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Alok Kumar Ranjan and Rahul Kumar, who were accused of illegally operating an unregistered ultrasound clinic under PCPNDT Act provisions. The court found that both petitioners, despite lacking medical qualifications, were conducting ultrasounds and obstructed the investigation, making them ineligible for bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Alok Kumar Ranjan and Rahul Kumar, who were accused of illegally operating an unregistered ultrasound clinic under PCPNDT Act provisions. The court found that both petitioners, despite lacking medical qualifications, were conducting ultrasounds and obstructed the investigation, making them ineligible for bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts