Alok Kumar Ranjan vs State of Bihar — 491/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010025502026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
2328/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
491/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
4-District Addl. S J- IV
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
126
Police Station
DAUDNAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Alok Kumar Ranjan
Adv. Ramjee singh
-
2.Rahul Kumar
Adv. Ramjee singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Alok Kumar Ranjan and Rahul Kumar, who were accused of illegally operating an unregistered ultrasound clinic under PCPNDT Act provisions. The court found that both petitioners, despite lacking medical qualifications, were conducting ultrasounds and obstructed the investigation, making them ineligible for bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J- IV
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 491/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Alok Kumar Ranjan and Rahul Kumar, who were accused of illegally operating an unregistered ultrasound clinic under PCPNDT Act provisions. The court found that both petitioners, despite lacking medical qualifications, were conducting ultrasounds and obstructed the investigation, making them ineligible for bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts