Ravindra Mehta vs State of Bihar — 363/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010019032026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
1736/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
363/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
MADANPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ravindra Mehta
Adv. Rampravesh mehta
-
2.Sangita Devi
Adv. Rampravesh mehta
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Ravindra Mehta in a case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that injuries were simple in nature, the parties are co-villagers with a mutual dispute, and a counter-case exists, warranting bail. The petitioner was directed to furnish a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 363/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge, Aurangabad granted anticipatory bail to Ravindra Mehta in a case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that injuries were simple in nature, the parties are co-villagers with a mutual dispute, and a counter-case exists, warranting bail. The petitioner was directed to furnish a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts