Amit Kumar vs State of Bihar — 350/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010018522026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

1689/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

350/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

4-District Addl. S J- IV

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amit Kumar

    Adv. Imteyaz Ansari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 350/2026 Amit Kumar v. State of Bihar — The court rejected Amit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry cruelty case (IPC §498-A, 379, 149). Although the petitioner claimed false implication and clean antecedents, the court found evidence indicating his extramarital affair was the root cause of marital discord, making him duty-bound to care for his wife. The serious nature of allegations and petitioner's conduct led to bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J- IV

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 350/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 350/2026 Amit Kumar v. State of Bihar — The court rejected Amit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry cruelty case (IPC §498-A, 379, 149). Although the petitioner claimed false implication and clean antecedents, the court found evidence indicating his extramarital affair was the root cause of marital discord, making him duty-bound to care for his wife. The serious nature of allegations and petitioner's conduct led to bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case