Ravish Kumar vs State of Bihar — 101/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010009672026
e-Filing Number
22-01-2026
Filing Number
883/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
101/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
796
Police Station
DAUDNAGAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravish Kumar
Adv. anil kumar chaubey
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court's Decision: The District and Additional Sessions Judge of Aurangabad, Bihar rejected the bail application of Ravish Kumar (aged 23) who was accused of kidnapping a minor girl under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the victim, a 14-year-old girl, was lured by the petitioner through Instagram with promises of marriage, and while she voluntarily left home with jewelry and cash, the petitioner's conduct in exploiting a minor constituted kidnapping. The serious nature of the offense against a minor and pending investigation warranted custody, resulting in bail rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court's Decision: The District and Additional Sessions Judge of Aurangabad, Bihar rejected the bail application of Ravish Kumar (aged 23) who was accused of kidnapping a minor girl under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the victim, a 14-year-old girl, was lured by the petitioner through Instagram with promises of marriage, and while she voluntarily left home with jewelry and cash, the petitioner's conduct in exploiting a minor constituted kidnapping. The serious nature of the offense against a minor and pending investigation warranted custody, resulting in bail rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts