TOMMY HILFIGER EUROPE B.V. DHRUV ANAND vs PARTHA CHATTERJEE — CS(COMM)/1302/2018

Disposed: -- on 28th November 2025.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Dec-2018

CNR: DLHC015783122018

Filing Number

CS(COMM)/578312/2018

Filing Date

19-Dec-2018

Registration No

CS(COMM)/1302/2018

Registration Date

19-Dec-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia

Judicial Branch

Original side

Decision Date

28-Nov-2025

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TOMMY HILFIGER EUROPE B.V. DHRUV ANAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARTHA CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish Dayal

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    View PDF

    The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V., granting a permanent injunction against defendant Partha Chatterjee for counterfeiting and infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks including 'TOMMY HILFIGER,' 'TOMMY SPORT,' and 'TOMMY GIRL.' The court found that Chatterjee, through his business 'Denim India,' was supplying counterfeit clothing bearing these marks, deceiving consumers and diluting the brand's goodwill. The defendant was ordered to pay ₹1,50,000 in damages and court costs for his infringement activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    No Court No Court At PresentView PDF

  7. 26-Aug-2025

    No Court No Court At PresentView PDF

  8. 22-Aug-2025

    No Court No Court At PresentView PDF

  9. 19-Aug-2025

    No Court No Court At PresentView PDF

  10. 30-Jul-2025

    No Court No Court At PresentView PDF

  11. 07-Mar-2025

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Sh. Sidharth MathurView PDF

  12. 17-Feb-2025

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Sh. Sidharth MathurView PDF

  13. 07-Nov-2024

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Sh. Sidharth MathurView PDF

  14. 03-Jul-2024

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Sh. Sidharth MathurView PDF

  15. 17-May-2024

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Sh. Sidharth MathurView PDF

  16. 12-Mar-2024

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Sh. Sidharth MathurView PDF

  17. 06-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit BansalView PDF

  18. 27-Feb-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit BansalView PDF

  19. 18-May-2020

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao

  20. 05-Feb-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar RaoView PDF

  21. 05-Feb-2020

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao

  22. 16-Oct-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar RaoView PDF

  23. 16-Oct-2019

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula

  24. 10-Oct-2019

    For Evidence

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Rakesh Pandit (Dhjs)

  25. 24-Sep-2019

    For Evidence

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Rakesh Pandit (Dhjs)

  26. 03-Jul-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev NarulaView PDF

  27. 03-Jul-2019

    Short Matters

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Rakesh Pandit (Dhjs)

  28. 14-May-2019

    Short Matters

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Rakesh Pandit (Dhjs)

  29. 03-May-2019

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Rakesh Pandit (Dhjs)View PDF

  30. 03-May-2019

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh

  31. 07-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 07-Mar-2019

    Fresh Matters and Ias

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  33. 19-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS(COMM)/1302/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V., granting a permanent injunction against defendant Partha Chatterjee for counterfeiting and infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks including 'TOMMY HILFIGER,' 'TOMMY SPORT,' and 'TOMMY GIRL.' The court found that Chatterjee, through his business 'Denim India,' was supplying counterfeit clothing bearing these marks, deceiving consumers and diluting the brand's goodwill. The defendant was ordered to pay ₹1,50,000 in damages and court costs for his infringement activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case