SARDHA RAM HARI RAM RAJAT ANEJA vs BIMLA DEVI — RC.REV./195/2025

Disposed: -- on 15th July 2025.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Jul-2025

CNR: DLHC010414212025

Filing Number

RC.REV./3795638/2025

Filing Date

07-Jul-2025

Registration No

RC.REV./195/2025

Registration Date

08-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

15-Jul-2025

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARDHA RAM HARI RAM RAJAT ANEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIMLA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit SharmaView PDF

    The Delhi High Court dismissed petitioner Sardha Ram Hari Ram's application seeking extension until December 31, 2027 to vacate rented premises. Justice Amit Sharma held that the petitioner had already been granted sufficient time (with prior deadlines of March 31, 2026, then June 1, 2026, with increased rent of Rs. 85,000/month), and granting further extension would deprive the respondent/landlord of premises lawfully recovered through an eviction order based on bona fide business requirement. The court ordered the petitioner to comply with his affidavit of undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit SharmaView PDF

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  5. 15-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF

  6. 09-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF

  7. 07-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RC.REV./195/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitioner Sardha Ram Hari Ram's application seeking extension until December 31, 2027 to vacate rented premises. Justice Amit Sharma held that the petitioner had already been granted sufficient time (with prior deadlines of March 31, 2026, then June 1, 2026, with increased rent of Rs. 85,000/month), and granting further extension would deprive the respondent/landlord of premises lawfully recovered through an eviction order based on bona fide business requirement. The court ordered the petitioner to comply with his affidavit of undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case