SANT SHRI ASARAM JI ASHRAM TRUST THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY SH. DINESH BHARDWAJ PANKAJ VIVEK vs SH. MAHAVIR PRASAD & ORS. — CS(OS)/196/2026

Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Next hearing 19-May-2026

CNR: DLHC010084312026

Filing Number

CS(OS)/89128/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

CS(OS)/196/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad

Judicial Branch

Original side

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANT SHRI ASARAM JI ASHRAM TRUST THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY SH. DINESH BHARDWAJ PANKAJ VIVEK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SH. MAHAVIR PRASAD & ORS.

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

    Summary In a partition and demarcation suit concerning land in Village Rajokari, New Delhi, the Delhi High Court directed defendants to maintain status quo on the suit property till the next hearing on 19.05.2026. The court declined to grant ex-parte ad-interim injunction as requested but imposed a status quo order preventing any further encroachments or alterations to the property, while allowing defendants time to file their written reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS(OS)/196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In a partition and demarcation suit concerning land in Village Rajokari, New Delhi, the Delhi High Court directed defendants to maintain status quo on the suit property till the next hearing on 19.05.2026. The court declined to grant ex-parte ad-interim injunction as requested but imposed a status quo order preventing any further encroachments or alterations to the property, while allowing defendants time to file their written reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case