VIKASH KUMAR DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/11924/2025
Status: Motion Hearing Matters. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010435592025
Filing Number
WPS/27103/2025
Filing Date
07-Oct-2025
Registration No
WPS/11924/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKASH KUMAR DEWANGAN
Adv. T.K.TIWARI,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY, ,TANMOY CHOUDHURY,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Deputy Secretary
-
3.Deputy Director
-
4.Transfer Committee Through its Chairman
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: In WPS/11924/2025, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard petitioner Vikas Kumar Dewangan's writ petition against the State of Chhattisgarh on 05/05/2026. The court granted adjournment to the petitioner's counsel as the arguing counsel was on adjustment. The petition was listed for hearing after summer vacation with no substantive order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
07-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/11924/2025
Case Summary: In WPS/11924/2025, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard petitioner Vikas Kumar Dewangan's writ petition against the State of Chhattisgarh on 05/05/2026. The court granted adjournment to the petitioner's counsel as the arguing counsel was on adjustment. The petition was listed for hearing after summer vacation with no substantive order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts