VIKASH KUMAR DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/11924/2025

Status: Motion Hearing Matters. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Hearing Matters Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010435592025

Filing Number

WPS/27103/2025

Filing Date

07-Oct-2025

Registration No

WPS/11924/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKASH KUMAR DEWANGAN

    Adv. T.K.TIWARI,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY, ,TANMOY CHOUDHURY,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Deputy Secretary

  3. 3.Deputy Director

  4. 4.Transfer Committee Through its Chairman

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: In WPS/11924/2025, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard petitioner Vikas Kumar Dewangan's writ petition against the State of Chhattisgarh on 05/05/2026. The court granted adjournment to the petitioner's counsel as the arguing counsel was on adjustment. The petition was listed for hearing after summer vacation with no substantive order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  8. 07-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/11924/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPS/11924/2025, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard petitioner Vikas Kumar Dewangan's writ petition against the State of Chhattisgarh on 05/05/2026. The court granted adjournment to the petitioner's counsel as the arguing counsel was on adjustment. The petition was listed for hearing after summer vacation with no substantive order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case