VAIBHAV RANJAN YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,ANAND MOHAN TIWARI — WPS/6288/2022
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010312232022
Filing Number
WPS/16760/2022
Filing Date
26-Sep-2022
Registration No
WPS/6288/2022
Registration Date
28-Sep-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VAIBHAV RANJAN YADAV
Adv. MATEEN SIDDIQUI,MONIKA THAKUR,MONIKA THAKUR, ,SANDEEP SINGH,NARENDRA MEHAR,Ghanshyam Kashyap,waquar naiyer,DIKSHA GOURAHA,HARSHMANDER RASTOGI,VEDANT SHADANGI,MONIKA THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,ANAND MOHAN TIWARI
-
2.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission
Adv. ANAND MOHAN TIWARI,SHIKHAR SHUKLA
-
3.Rajnikant Sahu
-
4.Anil Singh Thakur
Adv. ROHITASHVA SINGH,B.S.RAJPUT SUHAS MEHAR
-
5.Dushyant Kumar Bhoi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition challenging the recruitment process for Assistant Professor positions. The court vacated its earlier interim relief order after the Supreme Court permitted the State to proceed with appointments subject to the outcome of pending proceedings, with all appointment orders to explicitly mention they are conditional on the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Oct-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
10-Oct-2022
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
26-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/6288/2022
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition challenging the recruitment process for Assistant Professor positions. The court vacated its earlier interim relief order after the Supreme Court permitted the State to proceed with appointments subject to the outcome of pending proceedings, with all appointment orders to explicitly mention they are conditional on the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts