RAISEN PAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,JITENDRA NATH NANDE — WPC/3026/2020

Disposed: Contested--INFRUCTUOUS on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010271492020

Filing Number

WPC/13490/2020

Filing Date

24-Nov-2020

Registration No

WPC/3026/2020

Registration Date

27-Nov-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ACADEMIC MATTERS ( 7 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ADMISSION IN OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 706 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAISEN PAL

    Adv. ROHIT SHARMA,VATAN SAHU,VATAN SAHU, ,VATAN SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,JITENDRA NATH NANDE

  2. 2.Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhayalaya (IGKVV) Raipur Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.Registrar

  4. 4.University Grant Commission

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Raisen Pal's writ petition as infructuous, finding that due to passage of time, the academic session for which he sought permission to pursue a Ph.D. at Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhayalaya had already lapsed, rendering the relief sought incapable of being granted. Both the petitioner's counsel and respondents' counsel concurred that no substantive matter survived for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Dec-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  4. 04-Dec-2020

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

  5. 24-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3026/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Raisen Pal's writ petition as infructuous, finding that due to passage of time, the academic session for which he sought permission to pursue a Ph.D. at Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhayalaya had already lapsed, rendering the relief sought incapable of being granted. Both the petitioner's counsel and respondents' counsel concurred that no substantive matter survived for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case