RAJESH AHUJA vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Advocate - Sharad Mishra — WPC/2775/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010215392026

Filing Number

WPC/12389/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2775/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH AHUJA

    Adv. Pranjal Agrawal,VIDHI AGRAWAL,VIDHI AGRAWAL, ,VIDHI AGRAWAL

  2. 2.Ramesh Ahuja

  3. 3.Vikas Ahuja

  4. 4.Sushila Ahuja

  5. 5.Priya Ahuja

  6. 6.Somya Ahuja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Advocate - Sharad Mishra

  2. 2.Collector Cum District Magistrate

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Additional Tehsildar

  4. 4.Debts Recovery Tribunal

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 2775/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted interim relief to petitioners Rajesh, Ramesh, and Vikas Ahuja against forcible possession of their residential property by the Additional Tehsildar. The court directed the Tehsildar to respect a prior Debts Recovery Tribunal stay order (conditional on Rs. 20 lakh deposit) and halt possession proceedings until the next hearing in July 2026, after verifying the petitioners' compliance with the deposit requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2775/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 2775/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted interim relief to petitioners Rajesh, Ramesh, and Vikas Ahuja against forcible possession of their residential property by the Additional Tehsildar. The court directed the Tehsildar to respect a prior Debts Recovery Tribunal stay order (conditional on Rs. 20 lakh deposit) and halt possession proceedings until the next hearing in July 2026, after verifying the petitioners' compliance with the deposit requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case