NATTHU RAM SHORI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4454/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010214192026

Filing Number

WPS/12329/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4454/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION. ( 608 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NATTHU RAM SHORI

    Adv. PRAVEEN DHURANDHAR,Ranjana Tiwari,Ranjana Tiwari, ,N.S.DHURANDHAR,Ranjana Tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Joint Director

  4. 4.Collector

  5. 5.Chief Municipal Officer

  6. 6.Chief Executive Officer

  7. 7.G. Pawan Kumar (Press Reporter)

  8. 8.T. Goutam

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 4454/2026 Natthu Ram Shori vs. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief to petitioner Natthu Ram Shori, staying the demotion order dated 09.05.2026 that demoted him from Assistant Grade-II back to Cashier. The court found the demotion order "highly contradictory" and noted the petitioner was not afforded reasonable opportunity to be heard. Case adjourned for two weeks with directions for respondents 5-8 to be served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4454/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 4454/2026 Natthu Ram Shori vs. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief to petitioner Natthu Ram Shori, staying the demotion order dated 09.05.2026 that demoted him from Assistant Grade-II back to Cashier. The court found the demotion order "highly contradictory" and noted the petitioner was not afforded reasonable opportunity to be heard. Case adjourned for two weeks with directions for respondents 5-8 to be served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case