KAMLESH YADAV @ VIMLESH @ BANTI YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4930/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010210662026

Filing Number

MCRC/8914/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4930/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESH YADAV @ VIMLESH @ BANTI YADAV

    Adv. Pawan Kumar Kashyap,Umesh Pandey,Umesh Pandey, ,Umesh Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Summary of MCRC/4930/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Kamlesh Yadav, a 19-year-old accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a 14-year-old minor girl under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act sections. Justice Radhakishan Agrawal held that the gravity of offences, prima facie evidence of involvement, victim's court statement, and her objection to bail warranted detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  4. 26-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4930/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MCRC/4930/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Kamlesh Yadav, a 19-year-old accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a 14-year-old minor girl under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act sections. Justice Radhakishan Agrawal held that the gravity of offences, prima facie evidence of involvement, victim's court statement, and her objection to bail warranted detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case