KHAN WAQUARUZZAMAN KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4439/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010200082026

Filing Number

WPS/11526/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4439/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION. ( 608 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHAN WAQUARUZZAMAN KHAN

    Adv. KRISHNA TANDON,ASHUTOSH RAJ SINHA,ASHUTOSH RAJ SINHA, ,SWAPNIL THAWANEY,ASHUTOSH RAJ SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Eirector

  3. 3.Collector

  4. 4.District Education Officer

  5. 5.Principal

  6. 6.Narendra Kumar Maravi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: Khan Waquaruzzaman Khan, a government school lecturer, sought a review of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) decision for consideration as Principal based on the seniority list dated 25/11/2024. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without examining merits, directing the Director of Public Instruction (DPI) to communicate the decision already taken on his representation within three weeks of receiving the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Khan Waquaruzzaman Khan, a government school lecturer, sought a review of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) decision for consideration as Principal based on the seniority list dated 25/11/2024. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without examining merits, directing the Director of Public Instruction (DPI) to communicate the decision already taken on his representation within three weeks of receiving the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case