ANOOP CHANDRAKAR MAHESH MISHRA, ,Amit Kumar Verma,Sumit Jhawar,Sumit Jhawar vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4741/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010190172026

Filing Number

MCRC/8063/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4741/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANOOP CHANDRAKAR MAHESH MISHRA, ,Amit Kumar Verma,Sumit Jhawar,Sumit Jhawar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Anoop Chandrakar's second bail application (under Section 483 BNSS, 2023) in a case involving alleged kidnapping and forced marriage (Crime No. 154/2025). The court found sufficient grounds in the case diary showing the applicant committed the alleged offence under BNS Sections 138, 140(2), 140(3), 87, 296, 115(2), 351(2), and 3(5), and held that the serious nature of the charges precluded bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4741/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Anoop Chandrakar's second bail application (under Section 483 BNSS, 2023) in a case involving alleged kidnapping and forced marriage (Crime No. 154/2025). The court found sufficient grounds in the case diary showing the applicant committed the alleged offence under BNS Sections 138, 140(2), 140(3), 87, 296, 115(2), 351(2), and 3(5), and held that the serious nature of the charges precluded bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case